





<rss version="2.0">

<channel>
  <title><![CDATA[PLC Tax]]></title>
	<link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/</link>
	<description>Practical Law Company RSS feed</description>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Enacting extra-statutory concessions: draft order published
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>The draft Enactment of Extra-Statutory Concessions Order 2012, which&nbsp;enacts ESCs C10 and C16,&nbsp;among others, was published on 24 January 2012.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/6-517-5874?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:15:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247585197813-Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:15:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Interest not recoverable under tax deed refund clause (High Court)  
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>The High Court has determined that a bespoke provision&nbsp;in a tax deed, designed to pass the benefit of a tax repayment&nbsp;to the claimants, could not be construed as including the statutory interest that HMRC paid on the repaid tax (<em>Teesside Power Holdings Ltd v Electrabel International Holdings BV &amp;&nbsp;Anor [2012] EWHC 33 (Comm) (20 January 2012)</em>). &nbsp;</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/0-517-5481?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:00:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247584921267-Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:00:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        2010-11 self-assessment deadline extended
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>HMRC has confirmed that it will not impose late filing penalties or interest&nbsp;on taxpayers that submit their 2010-11 self-assessment tax returns or pay tax due by 31 January 2012 on 1 or 2 February 2012.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/1-517-5683?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:20:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247585066816-Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:20:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Consideration expressed as "premium" was non-deductible capital expenditure (First-tier Tribunal)
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>The First-tier Tribunal has held that an amendment to a property sale agreement, referring to the price&nbsp;as &quot;premium&quot; but stating that the amendment was intended to give effect to the agreement's calculation of the price, did not change the non-deductible capital nature of the payments (<em>Bluesparkle Limited v HMRC [2012] UKFTT 45 (TC)</em>).</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/2-517-5343?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:00:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247584735774-Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:00:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Commission refers UK to ECJ over transitional rules for abolition of extended limitation period for tax mistake claims
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>The European Commission has decided to refer the UK to the ECJ for failing to introduce proper transitional rules for the abolition of the extended limitation period for tax claims based on mistake of law brought before 8 September 2003, it was announced&nbsp;on 26 January 2012.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/9-517-5325?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:32:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247584675036-Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:32:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        HMRC answers questions on entrepreneurs' relief
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>With the consent of HMRC, responses by HMRC to technical questions on the&nbsp;operation of&nbsp;entrepreneurs' relief rules have been published.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/8-517-5241?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:10:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247584506190-Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:10:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        HMRC industrial action and 2010-11 self-assessment returns
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>HMRC's media office has confirmed that, while there are no plans to extend the 2010-11 self-assessment tax return deadline beyond 31 January 2012 because of proposed industrial action that day by HMRC staff, HMRC will ensure that no one is disadvantaged as a result of that action.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/3-517-5234?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:45:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247584496258-Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:45:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        First-tier Tribunal rules on consortium relief surrender when link company resident in Luxembourg
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>The First-tier Tribunal&nbsp;(tribunal) has ruled&nbsp;that non-discrimination tax treaty provisions prevent a company from being barred from surrendering losses to consortium group members simply by reason of the non-UK residence of its majority shareholder <em>(The Felixtowe Dock and Railway Company &amp; Others v HMRC [2011] UKFTT 838 (TC)).</em></p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/6-517-3002?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:55:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247581248402-Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:55:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Redundancy not "one-off event" for penalty suspension purposes (First-tier Tribunal)
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>The First-tier Tribunal considers that HMRC should be able to suspend the penalty for a redundant individual's&nbsp;carelessly inaccurate return because being made redundant may not be a &quot;one-off event&quot; (<em>Jonathan Paul Lindsay Cobb v HMRC [2012] UKFTT 40 (TC)</em>).</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/1-517-4787?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:25:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247584095672-Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:25:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        0T code and post-P45 share-based earnings: HMRC FAQs published
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>HMRC has published a set of FAQs about operating the 0T code on share-based payments made after a P45 has been issued to an employee.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/3-517-4692?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:45:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247583934103-Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:45:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        HMRC revises practice on reregistration input tax evidence
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>If a taxable person proves to HMRC that it paid VAT on the deemed supply that occurs on deregistration then, from 23 January 2012, HMRC will accept that evidence&nbsp;in any claim for pre-registration input tax&nbsp;if the taxable person later reregisters.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/5-517-4686?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247583925764-Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        New: EIS checklist
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>PLC Tax has published a new checklist of issues to consider when reviewing a company's articles of association where the company is seeking EIS investment.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/3-517-4343?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:19:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247583417845-Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:19:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Tax news round-up to 24 January 2012
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>News stories for the PLC Tax weekly e-mail to&nbsp;24&nbsp;January 2012.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/7-517-3676?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:01:42 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247582499812-Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:01:42 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Personal liability for NICs: subjective test applies for officer's neglect (First-tier Tribunal)
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>The First-tier Tribunal has held that&nbsp;a&nbsp;subjective&nbsp;test of neglect applies&nbsp;when determining whether a company's failure to pay National Insurance contributions (NICs)&nbsp;can be attributed to neglect on the part of an officer, making him personally liable for all or part of the unpaid NICs (<em>Charles Michael O'Rorke v HMRC [2011] UKFTT 839 (TC)</em>).</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/4-517-3183?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:00:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247581648178-Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:00:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Mistake in sub-contract document: solicitors' retainer with client
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>Akenhead J's judgment in <em>Shepherd Construction Ltd v Pinsent Masons LLP [2012] EWHC 43 (TCC)</em> struck out parts of a main contractor's claim, which alleged that its series of instructions to the defendant solicitors created a single contract that required the solicitors to keep previous advice under review.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/5-517-3700?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:00:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247582547523-Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:00:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Insurance-related fees neither part of TOGC nor insurance broking (High Court)
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>The High Court has held that insurance-related fees were subject to VAT as the exemptions for transfers of going concerns (TOGCs) and insurance brokers did not apply (<em>Royal Bank of Scotland v HMRC [2012] EWHC 9 (Ch)</em>).</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/4-517-3121?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:41:48 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247581509683-Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:41:48 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Lack of online facilities not reasonable excuse for late filing of partnership return (First-tier Tribunal)
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>The First-tier Tribunal has held that the lack of online filing facilities for partnerships did not give a partnership a reasonable excuse for filing its paper return late (<em>Astrid Koyeni-Efreeitems v HMRC [2012] UKFTT 13&nbsp;(TC)</em>).</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/9-517-3406?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:00:52 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247582193437-Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:00:52 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        Consultation on PAYE regulations to apply 0T code for post-P45 charges on employee securities and options, from 6 April 2012
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>HMRC has published a consultation&nbsp;on draft amending regulations to apply the 0T&nbsp;code (rather than the BR code)&nbsp;to&nbsp;post-P45 PAYE on employee securities (including shares) and options,&nbsp;which will increase PAYE liabilities in many cases. Comments can be submitted until 16 February 2012.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/4-517-3381?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:30:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247582167106-Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:30:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
                <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[
                        What's Market: deals added 7 January - 20 January 2012
                        ]]>
                    </title>
                    <description>
                      <![CDATA[
                        <p>A summary of the deals added to <a href="http://uk.practicallaw.com/about/WhatsMarketUK"><em>What's Market</em></a>&nbsp;during the last fortnight.</p>
                      
                        ]]>
                    </description>
                    <link>http://tax.practicallaw.com/9-517-2548?source=rss</link>
                    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT]]></pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1247579965634-Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT]]></guid>
                </item>
            
</channel>
</rss>


